Page: 
Source: 
p. 12, b. 228-248
p. 1, b. 1-22
p. 2, b. 23-42
p. 3, b. 43-62
p. 4, b. 63-81
p. 5, b. 82-103
p. 6, b. 104-124
p. 7, b. 125-142
p. 8, b. 143-162
p. 9, b. 163-183
p. 10, b. 184-206
p. 11, b. 207-227
p. 12, b. 228-248
Main text
Main text
A - Autograph
GE - German edition
GE1 - First German edition
FE - French edition
FE1 - First French edition
EE - English edition
EE1 - First English edition
EE2 - Corrected impression of EE1
IE - Italian edition
IE1 - First Italian edition
Select notes: 
Category
All
Graphic ambiguousness
Interpretations within context
Differences between sources
Editorial revisions
Corrections & alterations
Source & stylistic information
Notation
All
Pitch
Rhythm
Slurs
Articulation, Accents, Hairpins
Verbal indications
Pedalling
Fingering
Ornaments
Shorthand & other
Differences
No differences
A - Autograph
GE - German edition
GE1 - First German edition
FE - French edition
FE1 - First French edition
EE - English edition
EE1 - First English edition
EE2 - Corrected impression of EE1
IE - Italian edition
IE1 - First Italian edition
Importance
All
Important
Main
Prezentacja
Select 
copy link PDF Main text


  b. 231-239

con forza in b. 231-232 in A, contextual interpretation

con forza in b. 239 in A (possible interpretation→GEFE,EE,IE)

The con forza indication is written in A between the bottom stave in bars 231-232 and the top stave in bar 239. Under this indication, and over the R.H. part in bar 239, one can see traces of removal of a mark, probably a verbal indication or, e.g. . This suggests that Chopin changed his mind and replaced the deleted mark by con forza (added over it). This is how it was interpreted by GE (→FE,EE,IE). However, according to us, it is likely that the erasure was not related to con forza, which could have been added earlier and concerned the L.H. octave phrase in bars 231-232. Such an interpretation is strongly supported by the comparison with bars 73-74, in which an almost identical L.H. phrase is provided with con forza. Taking into account the fact that this indication suits bars 231-232 much better (musically speaking), to the main text we adopt the second interpretation.

Compare the passage in the sources»

category imprint: Graphic ambiguousness; Differences between sources; Source & stylistic information

issues: Corrections in A, Inaccuracies in A

notation: Verbal indications

Missing markers on sources: A, GE1, FE1, IE1, EE1, EE2