Page: 
Source: 
p. 12, b. 228-248
p. 1, b. 1-22
p. 2, b. 23-42
p. 3, b. 43-62
p. 4, b. 63-81
p. 5, b. 82-103
p. 6, b. 104-124
p. 7, b. 125-142
p. 8, b. 143-162
p. 9, b. 163-183
p. 10, b. 184-206
p. 11, b. 207-227
p. 12, b. 228-248
Main text
Main text
A - Autograph
GE - German edition
GE1 - First German edition
FE - French edition
FE1 - First French edition
EE - English edition
EE1 - First English edition
EE2 - Corrected impression of EE1
IE - Italian edition
IE1 - First Italian edition
Select notes: 
Category
All
Graphic ambiguousness
Interpretations within context
Differences between sources
Editorial revisions
Corrections & alterations
Source & stylistic information
Notation
All
Pitch
Rhythm
Slurs
Articulation, Accents, Hairpins
Verbal indications
Pedalling
Fingering
Ornaments
Shorthand & other
Differences
No differences
A - Autograph
GE - German edition
GE1 - First German edition
FE - French edition
FE1 - First French edition
EE - English edition
EE1 - First English edition
EE2 - Corrected impression of EE1
IE - Italian edition
IE1 - First Italian edition
Importance
All
Important
Main
Prezentacja
Select 
copy link PDF Main text


  b. 236

 &  in A, literal reading

2 long accents in GE

2 long accents in EE & IE

3 long accents in FE

2 long accents suggested by the editors

Two marks in the form of a hairpin – accents or short diminuendoes – visible in A are difficult to interpret. Neither the nature of the marks (an accent or a diminuendo) nor the stave they should concern are clear. The same can be said of rhythmic synchronisation – the beginning of the mark may be linked to the 2nd (6th) quaver in the bar or the 3rd (7th) quaver. As the A version we reproduce the graphic image of the manuscript (as far as possible). On the other hand, in the main text we provide the most likely, according to us, contextual interpretation, in which we consider both marks to be the continuation of the three long accents over the L.H. minims in the previous bars. Another possibility, although less likely, could be the way these marks were interpreted by GE and a variation of this interpretation adopted by EE and IE (which are surprisingly consistent considering the fact they were created independently). In FE, to the two signs between the staves (in the EE and IE arrangement) a third one was arbitrarily added, under the last L.H. crotchet.

Compare the passage in the sources»

category imprint: Graphic ambiguousness; Differences between sources

issues: EE revisions, FE revisions, Inaccuracies in A,

notation: Articulation, Accents, Hairpins

Missing markers on sources: A, GE1, FE1, IE1, EE1, EE2