



Page:
Source:
p. 6, b. 104-124
Main text
Prezentacja
Select
copy link
Main text

It is difficult to say what prompted the reviser of GE (→FE1,EE,IE) to add a raising f2 to f
2. Perhaps the missing
to the bottom note in the next third, which results in e
2 when interpreted literally, confused the engraver or the reviser. The erroneous accidental was removed only by FE2, perhaps after comparing it with analogous bar 126, in which f
2 is impossible due to f1 in the L.H. sequence of thirds.
Compare the passage in the sources»
category imprint: Differences between sources
issues: Errors in GE, GE revisions, FE revisions, Errors repeated in EE
notation: Pitch
Missing markers on sources:
A, GE1, FE1, IE1, EE1, EE2, FE2