Page: 
Source: 
p. 6, b. 104-124
p. 1, b. 1-22
p. 2, b. 23-42
p. 3, b. 43-62
p. 4, b. 63-81
p. 5, b. 82-103
p. 6, b. 104-124
p. 7, b. 125-142
p. 8, b. 143-162
p. 9, b. 163-183
p. 10, b. 184-206
p. 11, b. 207-227
p. 12, b. 228-248
Main text
Main text
A - Autograph
GE - German edition
GE1 - First German edition
FE - French edition
FE1 - First French edition
EE - English edition
EE1 - First English edition
EE2 - Corrected impression of EE1
IE - Italian edition
IE1 - First Italian edition
Select notes: 
Category
All
Graphic ambiguousness
Interpretations within context
Differences between sources
Editorial revisions
Corrections & alterations
Source & stylistic information
Notation
All
Pitch
Rhythm
Slurs
Articulation, Accents, Hairpins
Verbal indications
Pedalling
Fingering
Ornaments
Shorthand & other
Differences
No differences
A - Autograph
GE - German edition
GE1 - First German edition
FE - French edition
FE1 - First French edition
EE - English edition
EE1 - First English edition
EE2 - Corrected impression of EE1
IE - Italian edition
IE1 - First Italian edition
Importance
All
Important
Main
Prezentacja
Select 
copy link PDF Main text


  b. 108

b in A (→GEFE,IE)

c1 in EE, contextual interpretation

When interpreted literally, in EE the semibreve at the beginning of the bar is a c1. It is a mistake by the engraver, who wrote a ledger line across a note put at the right pitch. In the content transcription we consider this note to be a c1, as it seems that due to the c1 crotchet, which directly precedes it, this is how this notation was most probably interpreted. In the main text we provide the unquestionable version of the remaining sources, which is b

Compare the passage in the sources»

category imprint: Interpretations within context; Differences between sources

issues: Errors in EE, Errors repeated in EE

notation: Pitch

Missing markers on sources: A, GE1, FE1, IE1, EE1, EE2