Page: 
Source: 
p. 18, b. 316-332
p. 1, b. 1-20
p. 2, b. 21-42
p. 3, b. 43-60
p. 4, b. 61-75
p. 5, b. 76-90
p. 6, b. 91-105
p. 7, b. 106-126
p. 8, b. 127-147
p. 9, b. 148-163
p. 10, b. 164-178
p. 11, b. 179-198
p. 12, b. 199-224
p. 13, b. 225-240
p. 14, b. 241-255
p. 15, b. 256-271
p. 16, b. 272-293
p. 17, b. 294-315
p. 18, b. 316-332
Main text
Main text
A - Autograph
FE - French edition
FE1 - First French edition
FE2 - Corrected impression of FE1
FEJ - Jędrzejewicz copy
FES - Stirling copy
GE - German edition
GE1 - First German edition
GE2 - Revised impression of GE1
EE - English edition
EE1 - First English edition
EE2 - Corrected impression of EE1
Select notes: 
Category
All
Graphic ambiguousness
Interpretations within context
Differences between sources
Editorial revisions
Corrections & alterations
Source & stylistic information
Notation
All
Pitch
Rhythm
Slurs
Articulation, Accents, Hairpins
Verbal indications
Pedalling
Fingering
Ornaments
Shorthand & other
Differences
No differences
A - Autograph
FE - French edition
FE1 - First French edition
FE2 - Corrected impression of FE1
FEJ - Jędrzejewicz copy
FES - Stirling copy
GE - German edition
GE1 - First German edition
GE2 - Revised impression of GE1
EE - English edition
EE1 - First English edition
EE2 - Corrected impression of EE1
Importance
All
Important
Main
Prezentacja
Select 
copy link PDF Main text


  b. 321

in A

in GE & FE (→EE)

The range of the  mark in A may give rise to doubts, since its arms are of different length. The engravers took into account the bottom, longer arm and assumed that the mark reaches the last small crotchet. It does not seem to be an accurate interpretation of Chopin's intention, since such long crescendo cannot be simultaneously combined with smorz. - -. The editors of mUltimate Chopin assume the top arm of the mark to be reliable, written first, and this is how they reproduce this hairpin both in the transcription of A and in the main text.
(Minor inaccuracies in the reproduction of the A hairpins by the editions are also to be seen in the case of the previous marks in this bar.)

Compare the passage in the sources»

category imprint: Graphic ambiguousness; Differences between sources

issues: Inaccuracies in GE, Inaccuracies in FE, Scope of dynamic hairpins, Inaccuracies in A

notation: Articulation, Accents, Hairpins

Missing markers on sources: A, FE1, FE2, FEJ, FES, GE1, GE2, EE1, EE2