Page: 
Source: 
p. 18, b. 316-332
p. 1, b. 1-20
p. 2, b. 21-42
p. 3, b. 43-60
p. 4, b. 61-75
p. 5, b. 76-90
p. 6, b. 91-105
p. 7, b. 106-126
p. 8, b. 127-147
p. 9, b. 148-163
p. 10, b. 164-178
p. 11, b. 179-198
p. 12, b. 199-224
p. 13, b. 225-240
p. 14, b. 241-255
p. 15, b. 256-271
p. 16, b. 272-293
p. 17, b. 294-315
p. 18, b. 316-332
Main text
Main text
A - Autograph
FE - French edition
FE1 - First French edition
FE2 - Corrected impression of FE1
FEJ - Jędrzejewicz copy
FES - Stirling copy
GE - German edition
GE1 - First German edition
GE2 - Revised impression of GE1
EE - English edition
EE1 - First English edition
EE2 - Corrected impression of EE1
Select notes: 
Category
All
Graphic ambiguousness
Interpretations within context
Differences between sources
Editorial revisions
Corrections & alterations
Source & stylistic information
Notation
All
Pitch
Rhythm
Slurs
Articulation, Accents, Hairpins
Verbal indications
Pedalling
Fingering
Ornaments
Shorthand & other
Differences
No differences
A - Autograph
FE - French edition
FE1 - First French edition
FE2 - Corrected impression of FE1
FEJ - Jędrzejewicz copy
FES - Stirling copy
GE - German edition
GE1 - First German edition
GE2 - Revised impression of GE1
EE - English edition
EE1 - First English edition
EE2 - Corrected impression of EE1
Importance
All
Important
Main
Prezentacja
Select 
copy link PDF Main text


  b. 316

Long accent in A

Short accent in GE

No mark in FE (→EE)

In A the accent over a3 is clearly longer than the next ones. According to us, it is an inaccuracy, since there is no reason to differentiate between accents in such homogeneous texture (a short accent is also over the L.H. minim chord in this place). GE reproduced it as a short accent. The absence of the mark in FE (→EE) could be explained by an oversight by the copyist or by the engraver, yet further differences in the type and number of accents between A and FE suggest that Chopin was adding these marks independently to A and to [FC] or while proofreading FE. However, even under such circumstances, the missing accent seems to be an oversight.

Compare the passage in the sources»

category imprint: Graphic ambiguousness; Differences between sources

issues: Long accents, Inaccuracies in GE, Inaccuracies in A

notation: Articulation, Accents, Hairpins

Missing markers on sources: A, FE1, FE2, FEJ, FES, GE1, GE2, EE1, EE2