Page: 
Source: 
p. 5, b. 76-90
p. 1, b. 1-20
p. 2, b. 21-42
p. 3, b. 43-60
p. 4, b. 61-75
p. 5, b. 76-90
p. 6, b. 91-105
p. 7, b. 106-126
p. 8, b. 127-147
p. 9, b. 148-163
p. 10, b. 164-178
p. 11, b. 179-198
p. 12, b. 199-224
p. 13, b. 225-240
p. 14, b. 241-255
p. 15, b. 256-271
p. 16, b. 272-293
p. 17, b. 294-315
p. 18, b. 316-332
Main text
Main text
A - Autograph
FE - French edition
FE1 - First French edition
FE2 - Corrected impression of FE1
FEJ - Jędrzejewicz copy
FES - Stirling copy
GE - German edition
GE1 - First German edition
GE2 - Revised impression of GE1
EE - English edition
EE1 - First English edition
EE2 - Corrected impression of EE1
Select notes: 
Category
All
Graphic ambiguousness
Interpretations within context
Differences between sources
Editorial revisions
Corrections & alterations
Source & stylistic information
Notation
All
Pitch
Rhythm
Slurs
Articulation, Accents, Hairpins
Verbal indications
Pedalling
Fingering
Ornaments
Shorthand & other
Differences
No differences
A - Autograph
FE - French edition
FE1 - First French edition
FE2 - Corrected impression of FE1
FEJ - Jędrzejewicz copy
FES - Stirling copy
GE - German edition
GE1 - First German edition
GE2 - Revised impression of GE1
EE - English edition
EE1 - First English edition
EE2 - Corrected impression of EE1
Importance
All
Important
Main
Prezentacja
Select 
copy link PDF Main text


  b. 77-81

Appoggiaturas in A

Acciaccaturas in FE (→EE) & GE

The slashed grace notes in bar 77 and 81, which is inaccurate, were almost certainly written by Fontana in [FC] – slashed grace notes were part of Fontana's style as a copyist, which can be observed in the pieces in the case of which both the autograph and its copy are preserved, e.g. in the Preludes, Op. 28. Nevertheless, in the main text we give slashed grace notes, since it was in this form that Chopin wrote them in 4 remaining analogous places – bar 164, 168, 234 and 238. Generally, in obvious situations Chopin would often ignore whether grace notes were written precisely, allegedly writing long grace notes in places in which the context, like this one, determines the use of short grace notes.
The inaccurate notation was aptly revised in GE as well. 

Compare the passage in the sources»

category imprint: Differences between sources

issues: GE revisions, Notation of grace notes, Non-slashed grace notes

notation: Ornaments

Missing markers on sources: A, FE1, FE2, FEJ, FES, GE1, GE2, EE1, EE2