b. 10
c1-a1 in A (→GE), as well as FE1 (contextual interpretation) & FEJ (1st stage of corrections) |
||
c1-a1, c2 tied in FEJ (2nd stage of corrections) |
||
Possible interpretation of notation of FES |
For the 3rd crotchet in the bar we choose the unquestionable A version (→GE). The same version, although written down with errors, is to be seen in FE1. The mistakes were corrected in FE2, yet, according to us, another mistake was committed in the act – the topmost note was changed from a1 to c2. The erroneous FE2 version was subject to further corrections and changes in the preserved teaching copies. In some respects, interpretation of these additions is problematic, particularly in the case of the FES entries, where we suggest two possible interpretations.
According to us, the tie to c2 present in both copies is of technical and pedagogical nature, as it facilitates the performance of the broad chord on the 4th beat of the bar.
The presence of the FES version in EE2 suggests that the edition was co-revised by a person who had access to FES.
category imprint: Interpretations within context; Differences between sources; Corrections & alterations
issues: EE revisions, Errors in FE, Errors resulting from corrections, Terzverschreibung error, Annotations in FES, Authentic corrections of FE, Authentic post-publication changes and variants, Annotations in FEJ, FE revisions
notation: Pitch