Page: 
Source: 
p. 13, b. 225-240
p. 1, b. 1-20
p. 2, b. 21-42
p. 3, b. 43-60
p. 4, b. 61-75
p. 5, b. 76-90
p. 6, b. 91-105
p. 7, b. 106-126
p. 8, b. 127-147
p. 9, b. 148-163
p. 10, b. 164-178
p. 11, b. 179-198
p. 12, b. 199-224
p. 13, b. 225-240
p. 14, b. 241-255
p. 15, b. 256-271
p. 16, b. 272-293
p. 17, b. 294-315
p. 18, b. 316-332
Main text
Main text
A - Autograph
FE - French edition
FE1 - First French edition
FE2 - Corrected impression of FE1
FEJ - Jędrzejewicz copy
FES - Stirling copy
GE - German edition
GE1 - First German edition
GE2 - Revised impression of GE1
EE - English edition
EE1 - First English edition
EE2 - Corrected impression of EE1
Select notes: 
Category
All
Graphic ambiguousness
Interpretations within context
Differences between sources
Editorial revisions
Corrections & alterations
Source & stylistic information
Notation
All
Pitch
Rhythm
Slurs
Articulation, Accents, Hairpins
Verbal indications
Pedalling
Fingering
Ornaments
Shorthand & other
Differences
No differences
A - Autograph
FE - French edition
FE1 - First French edition
FE2 - Corrected impression of FE1
FEJ - Jędrzejewicz copy
FES - Stirling copy
GE - German edition
GE1 - First German edition
GE2 - Revised impression of GE1
EE - English edition
EE1 - First English edition
EE2 - Corrected impression of EE1
Importance
All
Important
Main
Prezentacja
Select 
copy link PDF Main text


  b. 234

Long accent in A, possible interpretation 

 in A, contextual interpretation

No sign in GE

Shorter  in FE (→EE)

In A the mark looks like a typical long accent, yet due to the graphic context, it can also be interpreted as a  hairpin encompassing almost the entire bar. This bar is exceptionally narrow in A, since Chopin wanted to fit it on the same page so that it does not open a new one. A comparison with analogous bar 154 is an argument for diminuendo, and this is the interpretation that we suggest in the main text. The FE version may be an attempt at finding a compromise interpretation of the A notation (by the copyist or by the engraver), while in GE the mark was overlooked (along with the slur and ten.).

Compare the passage in the sources»

category imprint: Graphic ambiguousness; Differences between sources

issues: Long accents, Scope of dynamic hairpins, Errors in GE

notation: Articulation, Accents, Hairpins

Missing markers on sources: A, FE1, FE2, FEJ, FES, GE1, GE2, EE1, EE2