Page: 
Source: 
p. 5, b. 76-90
p. 1, b. 1-20
p. 2, b. 21-42
p. 3, b. 43-60
p. 4, b. 61-75
p. 5, b. 76-90
p. 6, b. 91-105
p. 7, b. 106-126
p. 8, b. 127-147
p. 9, b. 148-163
p. 10, b. 164-178
p. 11, b. 179-198
p. 12, b. 199-224
p. 13, b. 225-240
p. 14, b. 241-255
p. 15, b. 256-271
p. 16, b. 272-293
p. 17, b. 294-315
p. 18, b. 316-332
Main text
Main text
A - Autograph
FE - French edition
FE1 - First French edition
FE2 - Corrected impression of FE1
FEJ - Jędrzejewicz copy
FES - Stirling copy
GE - German edition
GE1 - First German edition
GE2 - Revised impression of GE1
EE - English edition
EE1 - First English edition
EE2 - Corrected impression of EE1
Select notes: 
Category
All
Graphic ambiguousness
Interpretations within context
Differences between sources
Editorial revisions
Corrections & alterations
Source & stylistic information
Notation
All
Pitch
Rhythm
Slurs
Articulation, Accents, Hairpins
Verbal indications
Pedalling
Fingering
Ornaments
Shorthand & other
Differences
No differences
A - Autograph
FE - French edition
FE1 - First French edition
FE2 - Corrected impression of FE1
FEJ - Jędrzejewicz copy
FES - Stirling copy
GE - German edition
GE1 - First German edition
GE2 - Revised impression of GE1
EE - English edition
EE1 - First English edition
EE2 - Corrected impression of EE1
Importance
All
Important
Main
Prezentacja
Select 
copy link PDF Main text


  b. 85-90

3 upper slurs in A & GE2

3 lower slurs in GE1

4 lower slurs in FE (→EE)

Our variant suggestion

In 3 out of 4 similarly structured bars (bar 86 and 89-90), Chopin wrote in A a slur combining the top note of the 1st chord with the 1st quaver in the 2nd half of the bar. The absence of a similar slur in bar 85 is a patent inaccuracy – 3 bars featuring slurs are written in one line, whereas the one without the slur – in the preceding line (another factor could be the 6th quaver in this bar having been written on the bottom stave, which hampered the leading of the slur). In the main text, based on the principal source (A), we do add this slur. The fact that in GE1 the slurs are placed under the bottom L.H. notes resulted from routine procedures aimed at standardising the notation (changes of stem direction and moving accidentals to the notehead side). On the other hand, 4 slurs in FE (→EE) placed under the L.H. part probably resulted from Chopin's proofreading (perhaps already in [FC]) rather than from revision, since the slurs in analogous bars 172-173 and 176-177, in which A is devoid of slurs, were placed in the same manner. In the main text we provide the probably authentic FE slurs as an option (in brackets), since none of the sources includes slurs in both positions at the same time in these places.

Compare the passage in the sources»

category imprint: Differences between sources; Editorial revisions

issues: Inaccuracies in GE, GE revisions, Authentic corrections of FE

notation: Slurs

Missing markers on sources: A, FE1, FE2, FEJ, FES, GE1, GE2, EE1, EE2