b. 186
|
composition: Op. 49, Fantaisie in F minor
..
As in bar 184, both positions of the mark present in the sources may be authentic, hence we suggest considering the FE pedal, starting earlier, to be a potentially Chopinesque variant. category imprint: Differences between sources |
||||||
b. 186
|
composition: Op. 49, Fantaisie in F minor
..
The missing first tie to B must be a mistake, corrected in GE2. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Errors in GE , GE revisions |
||||||
b. 187-188
|
composition: Op. 49, Fantaisie in F minor
..
The difference in the pedalling between A and FE does not seem to be accidental – both versions can be musically justified, while the difference is audibly perceptible and gives this transition a different expressive mood, which suggests that both are authentic. For example, Chopin could have been adding pedal markings independently to A and to [FC] or while proofreading FE1. In the main text we give the markings of the principal source, that is A, while the FE version can be considered an equal variant. category imprint: Differences between sources; Corrections & alterations issues: Errors in GE , GE revisions |
||||||
b. 187-188
|
composition: Op. 49, Fantaisie in F minor
..
The hairpin was probably added to A after [FC] had been finished (probably together with slentando). In EE2 the mark – slightly shorter – was added on the basis of GE1. category imprint: Differences between sources; Corrections & alterations |
||||||
b. 187-188
|
composition: Op. 49, Fantaisie in F minor
..
In A the L.H. figure starting in the 2nd half of bar 187 was initially written on the bottom stave (in treble clef). The motif started with – analogously to the previous ones – a fifth, without the g1 third. category imprint: Corrections & alterations; Source & stylistic information issues: Corrections in A , Deletions in A , Accompaniment changes |