data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/73ecd/73ecd80c88ad44c39f3711b6bcc33ca9e1021267" alt=""
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/75013/75013441a15e45e6f391d55c49aaf803f3dff8a4" alt=""
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/57140/571405c7057401412640722d57e0f4262876af22" alt=""
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/3075f/3075f31e8b155e01785c3a53896ad205598099cf" alt=""
In the sources we encounter a few inaccuracies and differences in the notation of accidentals in the chromatic sequence:
- Before the last octave in bar 93 in A a
is present only to the top note, which was supplemented by GE and FE (→EE).
- Before the 1st octave in bar 94 Chopin wrote in A a cautionary
to the top note (b
1). GE added a mark also to the bottom note. In FE there is no accidental before this octave, yet EE contains both flats.
In addition, the deletions visible in A allow us to conclude that the 2nd R.H. quaver in bar 93 was initially written as c1-c
2.
Compare the passage in the sources »
category imprint: Interpretations within context; Differences between sources; Corrections & alterations; Source & stylistic information
issues: Errors in FE, Accidentals in different octaves, Corrections in A, GE revisions, Cautionary accidentals, Deletions in A, Enharmonic corrections, Inaccuracies in A
notation: Pitch