Page: 
Source: 
p. 1, b. 1-36
p. 1, b. 1-36
p. 2, b. 37-74
p. 3, b. 75-112
p. 4, b. 113-147
Main text
Main text
PE - Polish edition
PE1 - First Polish edition
PE2 - Revised impression of PE1
PE3 - Corrected impression of PE2
PE4 - Revised impression of PE3
GE - German edition
GE1 - First German edition
Select notes: 
Category
All
Graphic ambiguousness
Interpretations within context
Differences between sources
Editorial revisions
Corrections & alterations
Source & stylistic information
Notation
All
Pitch
Rhythm
Slurs
Articulation, Accents, Hairpins
Verbal indications
Pedalling
Fingering
Ornaments
Shorthand & other
Differences
No differences
PE - Polish edition
PE1 - First Polish edition
PE2 - Revised impression of PE1
PE3 - Corrected impression of PE2
PE4 - Revised impression of PE3
GE - German edition
GE1 - First German edition
Importance
All
Important
Main
Prezentacja
Select 
copy link PDF Main text


  b. 3-5

3 slurs in sources

Continuous slur suggested by the editors

The divided slur in the sources almost certainly resulted from a combination of extra-musical factors, e.g. unclear notation of [A] (e.g. due to combining slurs), inaccuracies (e.g. ink stoppage), transition to a new line, etc., since such slurring is contrary to the smoothly unfolding, homogeneous R.H. figuration. Due to the above, in the main text we give one, continuous slur.
See also bars 139-142

Compare the passage in the sources»

category imprint: Editorial revisions

issues:

notation: Slurs

Missing markers on sources: PE1, PE2, PE3, PE4, GE1