Ornaments
|
b. 71
|
composition: WN 29, Waltz in E minor
..
According to us, neither the original notation of PE1 (→GE,PE2) nor the version changed in PE3 (→PE4) – most probably under the influence of similar bar 87 – correspond to the performance envisioned by Chopin. When reading the grace notes suggested in our edition, the fact that they are written down differently ( category imprint: Interpretations within context; Differences between sources issues: Inaccuracies in PE , Revisions in #PE |
||||||
|
b. 124
|
composition: WN 29, Waltz in E minor
..
The missing arpeggio in PE2 (→PE3→PE4) is a side effect of ordering the notation of clefs at the beginning of this bar, which in PE opens a new page of text (see the note above). category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Errors resulting from corrections , Errors in PE , Revisions in #PE |
and 
) becomes understandable, since the first one, a1, refers to the notation of the previous bars. Consequently, the bar starts with a broken sixth, which corresponds to the motifs in the preceding bars. A similar figure, performed similarly yet written down differently, can also be found in, e.g. the Waltz in A
, Op. 34 No. 1, bars 28-29.
