Issues : Errors in FE
- « Previous
- 1
- 2
- Next »
b. 47
|
composition: Op. 30 No. 4, Mazurka in C# minor
..
The version of FE (→EE) must be erroneous (a typical Terzverschreibung), which is confirmed by the correction in FED, most probably coming from Chopin. category imprint: Interpretations within context; Differences between sources issues: Annotations in teaching copies , Errors in FE , Annotations in FED , Terzverschreibung error |
||||||||||||||
b. 54-62
|
composition: Op. 30 No. 4, Mazurka in C# minor
..
In bars 54, 56-57 and 62 particular sources do not include some of the slurs linking the semiquaver to the chord. A comparison of the versions suggests that both in FC and FE at least one slur present in [A] was left out. On the other hand, both in EE and GE the texts of the bases were revised by adding slurs, yet none of them did it consistently. category imprint: Differences between sources; Editorial revisions issues: EE revisions , Errors in FE , GE revisions , Errors of FC |
||||||||||||||
b. 94
|
composition: Op. 30 No. 4, Mazurka in C# minor
..
FE (→EE) feature here an f1-g1 second, twice (as in the previous bar). The mistake was corrected in FED, perhaps by Chopin. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Annotations in teaching copies , Errors in FE , Annotations in FED |
||||||||||||||
b. 105-106
|
composition: Op. 30 No. 4, Mazurka in C# minor category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Errors in FE |
||||||||||||||
b. 113-115
|
composition: Op. 30 No. 4, Mazurka in C# minor
..
In FE (→EE) there are no arpeggios, which is a patent mistake, as is the absence of one of them in FC (at the beginning of bar 114). The defect of the copy was corrected in GE. category imprint: Differences between sources; Editorial revisions issues: Errors in FE , GE revisions , Errors of FC |
- « Previous
- 1
- 2
- Next »