Select: 
Category
All
Graphic ambiguousness
Interpretations within context
Differences between sources
Editorial revisions
Corrections & alterations
Source & stylistic information
Ornaments
All
Pitch
Rhythm
Slurs
Articulation, Accents, Hairpins
Verbal indications
Pedalling
Fingering
Ornaments
Shorthand & other
Importance
All
Important
Main


Ornaments

b. 113-115

composition: Op. 30 No. 4, Mazurka in C# minor

..

In FE (→EE) there are no arpeggios, which is a patent mistake, as is the absence of one of them in FC (at the beginning of bar 114). The defect of the copy was corrected in GE.

category imprint: Differences between sources; Editorial revisions

issues: Errors in FE , GE revisions , Errors of FC

b. 116

composition: Op. 30 No. 4, Mazurka in C# minor

No sign in FC (→GE)

Arpeggio sign on 3rd beat in FE (→EE)

..

The question of whether Chopin wanted the last chord in this bar to be played as an arpeggio remains open – see analogous bar 20.

category imprint: Differences between sources

b. 119-123

composition: Op. 30 No. 4, Mazurka in C# minor

No arpeggio signs in FC (→GE1)

Arpeggio signs in FE (→EE) & GE2

..

The missing arpeggios to the tenth chords in bars 119, 121 and 123 are most probably an oversight by the copyist in FC (→GE1), revised in GE2.

category imprint: Differences between sources

issues: GE revisions , Errors of FC

b. 127

composition: Op. 30 No. 4, Mazurka in C# minor

No ornament in FC

in FE (→EE) & GE

..

The missing  in FC must be an oversight by the copyist, corrected in GE.

category imprint: Differences between sources

issues: GE revisions , Errors of FC