Articulation, Accents, Hairpins
- « Previous
- 1
- 2
- 3
- 4
- Next »
b. 57
|
composition: Op. 30, Mazurka in D♭ major
..
In the main text we include the hairpin present only in FE (→EE) in a variant form, since it is absent in the principal source, yet its authenticity is unquestionable; it can be considered a complement to the indication. category imprint: Differences between sources; Editorial revisions issues: Authentic corrections of FE |
||||
b. 59
|
composition: Op. 30, Mazurka in D♭ major
..
The easiest explanation for the missing staccato dot in FC (→GE) would be an oversight by the copyist – in the entire Mazurka a staccato mark on the 1st quaver in the bar is present in the vast majority of similar figures, thus constituting an element defining the Mazurka characteristic dance gesture. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Errors of FC |
||||
b. 62
|
composition: Op. 30, Mazurka in D♭ major
..
The easiest explanation for the missing staccato dot in FE (→EE) would be an oversight by the engraver – in the entire Mazurka a staccato mark on the 1st quaver in the bar appears in the vast majority of similar figures, constituting an element defining the characteristic dance gesture of the Mazurka. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Errors in FE |
||||
b. 63
|
composition: Op. 30, Mazurka in D♭ major
..
In the main text we suggest adding a staccato dot at the beginning of the bar. In the three remaining places the quaver sixths, followed by a semiquaver rest, are provided with dots in at least one authentic source (FC and FE), which allows us to consider the absence of a dot in the discussed bar to be an oversight. category imprint: Editorial revisions |
||||
b. 73
|
composition: Op. 30, Mazurka in D♭ major
..
The accent could have been overlooked by the copyist or added in the stage of proofreading FE. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Authentic corrections of FE , Errors of FC |
- « Previous
- 1
- 2
- 3
- 4
- Next »