![](/build/images/logo_left-en.png)
![](/build/images/pl-button.5cab5de0.png)
![](/build/images/pomoc-button.d3d09842.png)
![](/build/images/pomoc-button-en.5098433b.png)
Issues : Inaccuracies in FC
b. 17-18
|
composition: Op. 30 No. 2, Mazurka in B minor
..
The pedalling of FC (→GE) must be inaccurate, as it was the case with bar 7. It is particularly obvious in bar 18, in which such long pedal leads to an awkward step in the next bar: an F category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Inaccuracies in FC |
|||||||||
b. 20
|
composition: Op. 30 No. 2, Mazurka in B minor
..
We consider the missing category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Inaccuracies in FE , No pedal release mark , Inaccuracies in FC |
|||||||||
b. 24
|
composition: Op. 30 No. 2, Mazurka in B minor
..
In the main text we give a slur with a 'tenuto' ending, present in FE (→EE). The shorter slur of FC must be inaccurate here, which is proven by the longer slurs of the copy in all analogous situations (bars 32, 56 and 64). category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Inaccuracies in FC , Tenuto slurs |
|||||||||
b. 28
|
composition: Op. 30 No. 2, Mazurka in B minor
..
The GE version with a three-note chord in the 2nd L.H. crotchet is most probably a mistake by the engraver, who saw a note in the small protrusion of this crotchet's stem. Admittedly, notes on ledger lines can be barely visible (or not at all), but in the case of chords, it concerns the outermost notes – Fontana would mark the vast majority of inner notes in a clear manner. The absence of this c category imprint: Graphic ambiguousness; Differences between sources issues: Inaccuracies in FC |
|||||||||
b. 50
|
composition: Op. 30 No. 2, Mazurka in B minor category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Inaccuracies in FC |