![](/build/images/logo_left-en.png)
![](/build/images/pl-button.5cab5de0.png)
![](/build/images/pomoc-button.d3d09842.png)
![](/build/images/pomoc-button-en.5098433b.png)
Issues : Centrally placed marks
b. 1
|
composition: Op. 10 No 1, Etude in C major
..
The category imprint: Interpretations within context; Differences between sources issues: Centrally placed marks |
||||||||
b. 1
|
composition: Op. 25 No 4, Etude in A minor
..
According to us, placing category imprint: Differences between sources issues: GE revisions , Inaccuracies in FC , Centrally placed marks |
||||||||
b. 1
|
composition: Op. 11, Concerto in E minor, Mvt I
..
The manner the category imprint: Graphic ambiguousness; Differences between sources issues: Centrally placed marks |
||||||||
b. 1
|
composition: Op. 30 No. 1, Mazurka in C minor
..
It is unclear how the difference in the placement of the initial category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Centrally placed marks |
||||||||
b. 2-4
|
composition: Op. 10 No 12, Etude in C minor
..
The performance markings of A quite significantly differ from the ones included in FE (→GE,EE). Due to the fact that next to the omission of verbal indications in A the accents in the R.H. in bars 2 and 4 were added, we consider the printed version as proofread by Chopin and we adopt it in the main text. The category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Centrally placed marks |