Issues : Errors of FC
b. 9
|
composition: Op. 28 No. 18, Prelude in F minor
..
category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Errors of FC |
||||||||||||
b. 9-24
|
composition: Op. 30, Mazurka in D♭ major
..
Staccato dots under (over) the bass notes are present in this theme both in FC and FE in the vast majority of cases (we take into account both the discussed bars and their counterparts upon the return of the theme (bars 79-94). The distribution of the bars devoid of dots is certainly accidental, hence in the main text we give them in all bars. category imprint: Differences between sources; Editorial revisions issues: Errors in FE , Errors of FC |
||||||||||||
b. 11
|
composition: Op. 28 No. 9, Prelude in E major
..
Like in the previous two bars, we assume the bottom arm of the hairpin in A to be reliable. The mark is absent in all the remaining sources, which is almost certainly a result of oversights:
category imprint: Graphic ambiguousness; Differences between sources issues: Errors in FE , Scope of dynamic hairpins , Errors of FC , Inaccuracies in A |
||||||||||||
b. 11
|
composition: Op. 28 No. 9, Prelude in E major
..
The missing dashes marking the range of cresc. must be an oversight of Fontana in FC (→GE). In CGS the dashes reach only the middle of the bar, which is one of many minor inaccuracies of that copy. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Errors of FC , Inaccuracies in CGS |
||||||||||||
b. 11-12
|
composition: Op. 28 No. 10, Prelude in C♯ minor
..
The missing slur in FC (→GE) is an oversight of Fontana. The slur of A was being extended so that it could also encompass the last crotchet in b. 12. The added fragment ends already in the next bar, in which, however, there is not a single element of notation to which it could have been led. Therefore, it is simply an inaccuracy, quite frequent for Chopin. category imprint: Differences between sources; Source & stylistic information issues: Inaccurate slurs in A , Corrections in A , Embracing slurs , Errors of FC |