Issues : Rhythmic errors

b. 38

composition: Op. 10 No 7, Etude in C major

Rhythm in A, literal reading

A, possible interpretation

FE (→EE3)

GE with shifted accent

EE4 with two accents

..

The rhythm of A, interpreted literally, is unclear. Aligning the notes of the L.H. under the part of the R.H. suggests that Chopin thought of an analogous version to the version of bar 34 in this place. In the main text we adopt the version of FE (→EE3), as it is the latest authentic source, while the notation therein is faultless and unequivocal. The suggested variants include also different placement and number of accents in GE and EE4, most probably or certainly non-authentic.

category imprint: Interpretations within context; Differences between sources; Corrections & alterations

issues: Errors in FE , Rhythmic errors , Errors of A , Authentic corrections of FE

b. 40

composition: Op. 43, Tarantella

..

In A and FC3 cis not dotted (inaccuracy).

category imprint: Interpretations within context; Differences between sources

issues: Cautionary accidentals , Rhythmic errors , Errors of A

b. 41-43

composition: Op. 10 No 5, Etude in G♭ major

Rhythm in A, interpretation

FE (→GE,EE)

..

In bars 41 and 43 A has the original version of the rhythm, corrected by Chopin in FE (→GE,EE). Moreover, in bar 41 the notation of A is erroneous, as there are no dots next to the crotchet on the 2nd quaver in the bar extending its value.

category imprint: Interpretations within context; Differences between sources; Corrections & alterations

issues: Rhythmic errors , Errors of A , Authentic corrections of FE

b. 45-46

composition: Op. 2, Variations, complete

Notation in A (→GEEE,FESB)

Notation in FE1 (→FE2)

..

In the main text, we place a demisemiquaver under/over the last note of a semiquaver triplet in each of the 4 places where such a combination occurs, in accord with the notation of A (→GEEE,FESB). In FE1 (→FE2) the demisemiquaver in these figures is placed after the last semiquaver of the triplet. This is certainly an arbitrary revision of the engraver of this edition, who had not yet seen that Chopin was using this Baroque-Classical convention, which in the 19th century was gradually superseded by a notation conforming with the strictly calculated nominal rhythmic values of the notes.
Chopin would use that convention throughout his entire oeuvre – see the chapter dedicated to that issue in: Jan Ekier, Introduction to the National Edition, Editorial Issuesp. 183.

In all places (as well as in bar 44) AsI notes a dotted rhythm in twice the rhythmic values, as . This is an obvious mistake.

category imprint: Interpretations within context; Differences between sources

issues: Rhythmic errors , Dotted rhythms and triplets , FE revisions

b. 45

composition: Op. 2, Variations, complete

..

In A and all editions, the e1 note on the 3rd crotchet in the bar is wrongly a double dotted crotchet. In AsI the note has the correct rhythmic value.

category imprint: Interpretations within context; Editorial revisions

issues: Rhythmic errors , Errors of A , Errors repeated in GE , Errors repeated in FE , Errors repeated in EE