Issues : Errors of FC
|
b. 7
|
composition: Op. 28 No. 13, Prelude in F♯ major
..
The slur of A, although perfectly visible, was, nevertheless, overlooked both in FC (→GE) and FE (→EE). category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Errors in FE , Errors of FC |
||||||
|
b. 7-9
|
composition: Op. 28 No. 12, Prelude in G♯ minor
..
The slur over b. 8 encompasses in A 5 top-voice quavers. However, according to us, it is possible that Chopin meant a whole-bar slur, as reproduced in FE (→EE). The slurring of FC is definitely incompatible with the notation of A, although the situation between b. 8-9 is ambiguous in the copy – the slur in b. 8 (at the end of the line) suggests that it should be continued, whereas the slur in b. 9 rather does not. However, as b. 9 is not written out with notes, which impedes a reliable evaluation of the placement of the beginning of the slur, we take into account the ending of the slur in b. 8. This is how it was interpreted in GE too. category imprint: Graphic ambiguousness; Differences between sources issues: Errors of FC , Uncertain slur continuation |
||||||
|
b. 7
|
composition: Op. 30 No. 1, Mazurka in C minor
..
The missing e category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Errors of FC |
||||||
|
b. 8
|
composition: Op. 28 No. 6, Prelude in B minor category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Errors of FC |
||||||
|
b. 9-10
|
composition: Op. 43, Tarantella category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Errors of FC |
1 in 
in 
