Issues : Accompaniment changes
b. 503
|
composition: Op. 31, Scherzo in B♭ minor
..
In A one can see a crossing-out of both the second and third crotchet in the L.H. It is difficult to decipher what was crossed out:
category imprint: Corrections & alterations; Source & stylistic information issues: Deletions in A , Accompaniment changes |
|||
b. 514
|
composition: Op. 11, Concerto in E minor, Mvt I
..
In the main text, we suggest adding a slur and dots after analogous bar 159. Missing performance indications could have been a result, unintended by Chopin, of a serious proofreading covering the beam and pitch of the 1st quaver (visible traces of changes in FE). category imprint: Editorial revisions; Corrections & alterations |
|||
b. 521-522
|
composition: Op. 31, Scherzo in B♭ minor
..
The crossings-out visible in A allow us to reconstruct the previous version of the 2nd and 4th chords: . The textural affinity with the motifs in b. 516-518 allows us to assume that it was the original version. category imprint: Corrections & alterations; Source & stylistic information issues: Corrections in A , Deletions in A , Accompaniment changes |
|||
b. 524-525
|
composition: Op. 31, Scherzo in B♭ minor
..
The mark crossed out in A on the 2nd beat of bar 524 is most probably a crotchet rest. It means that initially the L.H. part was the same as in b. 516 (except for the enharmonic difference in the notation). category imprint: Corrections & alterations; Source & stylistic information issues: Corrections in A , Deletions in A , Accompaniment changes |
|||
b. 702
|
composition: Op. 31, Scherzo in B♭ minor
..
After alterations, the L.H. part in A was deleted and rewritten on the stave below. The original version: . category imprint: Corrections & alterations; Source & stylistic information issues: Corrections in A , Deletions in A , Accompaniment changes |