Issues : Errors in FE
|
b. 1
|
composition: Op. 28 No. 1, Prelude in C major category imprint: Differences between sources; Source & stylistic information issues: Errors in FE , FE revisions |
|||
|
b. 1
|
composition: Op. 28 No. 21, Prelude in B♭ major
..
In the main text we include the staccato dot placed in A quite high above the 1st quaver; perhaps this is the reason it was overlooked in FE (→EE). On the basis of the preserved photograph, it is difficult to conclude whether the dot was copied in FC. According to us, it is likely that it is between the ledger lines, poorly legible due to the beam in b. 41, visible through the other page. category imprint: Graphic ambiguousness; Differences between sources issues: Errors in FE , Errors in GE |
|||
|
b. 1
|
composition: Op. 28 No. 14, Prelude in E♭ minor
..
The change of time signature from category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Errors in FE , 4/4 or 2/2 |
|||
|
b. 1
|
composition: Op. 28 No. 12, Prelude in G♯ minor
..
The 4th quaver in FE is an erroneous f category imprint: Interpretations within context; Differences between sources issues: Annotations in teaching copies , EE revisions , Errors in FE , Annotations in FED |
|||
|
b. 1
|
composition: Op. 28 No. 16, Prelude in B♭ minor
..
The change of time signature in FE probably resulted from the engraver's inattention. In Chopin's pieces, it was common that engravers did not differentiate between category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Errors in FE , 4/4 or 2/2 |
in 
in 
Minor, No. 14, B
1, as a result of which the next quaver is also wrong – it is an e1 instead of an e
, completely unjustified before f
