Issues : Long accents
b. 5
|
composition: Op. 27 No 2, Nocturne in D♭ major
..
The accent over a1 is doubtless a long one in A; this is testified by the change made in GE2 (probably after a repeated analysis of A). The sign in FE is not quite clear, yet it resembles a long accent more than a short one. In spite of that, EE has a short accent over the note in question. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Long accents , Inaccuracies in GE |
|||||||||||
b. 5
|
composition: Op. 24 No. 4, Mazurka in B♭ minor
..
A long accent at the beginning of the bar is very clear in A, having a characteristic shape and a typical size. Nevertheless, a short accent was printed in GE (→FE→EE). category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Long accents , Inaccuracies in GE |
|||||||||||
b. 5-9
|
composition: Op. 24 No. 3, Mazurka in A♭ major
..
Chopin replaced the written in AI with a long accent in A (→GE1→FE→EE). In GE2 the sign was replaced with diminuendo hairpins. category imprint: Interpretations within context; Differences between sources; Corrections & alterations issues: Long accents , Inaccuracies in GE , Placement of markings |
|||||||||||
b. 5-13
|
composition: Op. 10 No 6, Etude in E♭ minor
..
In bars 5 and 13 it is not certain whether the difference between the indications (accents, hairpins) of A and FE (→GE,EE) is a result of the engraver's inaccuracy or Chopin's intervention. In the main text we propose coherent indications of A. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Long accents , Inaccuracies in FE |
|||||||||||
b. 5-6
|
composition: Op. 10 No 7, Etude in C major
..
In A the accent in bar 5 is significantly longer than the one in bar 6 (similarly in bars 9-10). A minor difference was reproduced only in EE, which is probably a fortuitous coincidence. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Long accents , Inaccuracies in GE |