![](/build/images/logo_left-en.png)
![](/build/images/pl-button.5cab5de0.png)
![](/build/images/pomoc-button.d3d09842.png)
![](/build/images/pomoc-button-en.5098433b.png)
Issues : Errors in PE
b. 74
|
composition: WN 17, Polonaise in B♭ major
..
The pitch and possible hold of the 2nd quaver of the bar raise doubts in the sources. Both in JC and in PE, when read literally, the note is a non-sustained d In the main text we give probably the only authentic version, written faultlessly in EF. category imprint: Interpretations within context; Differences between sources issues: Errors of JC , Errors in PE |
||||||||||
b. 74
|
composition: WN 17, Polonaise in B♭ major
..
PE lacks the category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Errors in PE |
||||||||||
b. 76-77
|
composition: WN 17, Polonaise in B♭ major
..
In PE, there are no dots extending the semiquavers on the 1st beat of those bars – both in bar 76 and the first one in bar 77. They are patent errors, perhaps provoked by a too tight packing of notes in those places. category imprint: Interpretations within context; Differences between sources issues: Errors in PE |
||||||||||
b. 76
|
composition: WN 17, Polonaise in B♭ major
..
PE has a category imprint: Interpretations within context; Differences between sources issues: Errors in PE |
||||||||||
b. 89
|
composition: WN 29, Waltz in E minor
..
The digit '4' over the last quaver is present in the sources only the second time (bar 89/113). The mark in bar 89 was most probably overlooked by the engraver of PE (→GE). In the main text we give the complete notation of bar 89/113. category imprint: Differences between sources; Editorial revisions issues: Errors in PE |