Issues : Omission of current key accidentals
b. 271
|
composition: Op. 16, Rondo in E♭ major category imprint: Interpretations within context; Differences between sources issues: EE revisions , Errors in FE , GE revisions , Omission of current key accidentals , Errors repeated in EE |
|||
b. 272
|
composition: Op. 39, Scherzo in C♯ minor
..
In FE, there is no raising g1 to g1. This patent inaccuracy could have already been present in the manuscript. category imprint: Differences between sources |
|||
b. 272
|
composition: Op. 11, Concerto in E minor, Mvt I
..
In GE1 (→GE2), there is no before the second quaver. It must be a mistake – between two bars based on the same four-note diminished chord containing g, a possible g would require a cautionary , not to mention the tied g in violin II. It was most probably [A] that was the source of the mistake, since the in FE was added only just in print. The mark was added in GE3. category imprint: Interpretations within context; Differences between sources issues: GE revisions , Omission of current key accidentals , Authentic corrections of FE , Errors repeated in GE |
|||
b. 274
|
composition: Op. 16, Rondo in E♭ major
..
In FE (→EE1), there is no raising a2 to a2. The error, obvious in this context, may have occurred already in [A]. The necessary accidental was added in GE and EE2 (→EE3). Similarly in bar 290. category imprint: Interpretations within context; Differences between sources issues: Errors in FE , GE revisions , Omission of current key accidentals , Errors repeated in EE |
|||
b. 274
|
composition: Op. 44, Polonaise in F♯ minor
..
According to us, the version with d resulted from Chopin having overlooked the in [A] (→GE,[FC]→FE1). Therefore, in the main text we include the added in FE2 and EE. category imprint: Differences between sources |