Issues : Changed phrase length
- « Previous
- 1
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
- Next »
|
b. 105-132
|
composition: Op. 50 No. 3, Mazurka in C♯ minor
..
B. 105-136 are absent in AI – b. 104 is followed by the original version of b. 137-140 and continuation of the Mazurka. category imprint: Differences between sources; Source & stylistic information issues: Changed phrase length |
|||||
|
b. 111
|
composition: Op. 2, Variations, complete
..
The version of AsI, in which it is also the second part of this variation that was repeated, b. 112-127 (in b. 112 the repeat sign is marked only with an additional double bar line; its meaning becomes clear in b. 127, with two volte), was initially also in A, which can be determined on the basis of the visible corrections – to the right of the double bar line following b. 111, one can see traces of erasure of 4 dots, which, together with that line, constituted a repeat sign. In A, a respective deletion is also at the end of this part, where the 1st volta of b. 127 was deleted. category imprint: Corrections & alterations; Source & stylistic information issues: Corrections in A , Changed phrase length |
|||||
|
b. 127
|
composition: Op. 2, Variations, complete
..
In AsI, there are 2 versions of this bar – the 1st volta, slightly different from the 2nd volta of b. 111, with a repeat sign at the end, and the 2nd volta, generally compliant with the final text. The repetition of b. 112-127 was initially also present in A, in which, however, Chopin removed it by deleting the bar creating the 1st volta of b. 127 and erasing the 2nd volta marking over the bar containing the ending of the solo part. category imprint: Differences between sources; Corrections & alterations; Source & stylistic information issues: Corrections in A , Deletions in A , Changed phrase length |
|||||
|
b. 150-155
|
composition: Op. 2, Variations, complete
..
In AsI b. 152-167 are then repeated, in spite of the absence of repeat signs. It is a result of two versions of b. 166-167, marked as 1. volta and 2. volta. Repetition (carefully marked) was originally also written in A, in which, however, Chopin removed the repeat sign at the beginning of b. 152 (by erasing double dots, as a result of which a double bar line was left) and crossed out 1. volta of b. 166-167. Cf. the analogous shortening of variation I. category imprint: Interpretations within context; Differences between sources; Corrections & alterations; Source & stylistic information issues: Changed phrase length |
|||||
|
b. 165-167
|
composition: Op. 2, Variations, complete
..
In AsI there are two versions of b. 166-167, marked as 1. and 2. volta, which, in spite of the absence of repeat signs (including the opening one), implies that b. 152-167 are to be repeated. In A these bars are also repeated (the repetition is provided with appropriate repeat signs and with both versions of b. 166-167); however, Chopin removed the repetition in A by crossing out 1. volta and by erasing the 2. volta bracket (incidentally, the crossed-out 1st version is erroneously marked as 2. volta). We reproduce the notation of AsI only in the graphic transcription, whereas in the content transcription, taking advantage of the fact that b. 150-151 and 1. volta of b. 166-167 are identical, we put repeat signs before b. 150 and after b. 165, which allows us to keep the parallel course of the version of AsI and the remaining ones. category imprint: Differences between sources; Editorial revisions; Corrections & alterations; Source & stylistic information issues: Corrections in A , Errors of A , Deletions in A , Changed phrase length |
- « Previous
- 1
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
- Next »