![](/build/images/logo_left-en.png)
![](/build/images/pl-button.5cab5de0.png)
![](/build/images/pomoc-button.d3d09842.png)
![](/build/images/pomoc-button-en.5098433b.png)
Issues : Scope of dynamic hairpins
b. 5
|
composition: Op. 2, Variations, complete
..
In A, the pair of dynamic hairpins was written as close as possible to the top voice so that it was clear that it concerned this very voice; the slightly shortened category imprint: Graphic ambiguousness; Differences between sources issues: Inaccuracies in GE , Scope of dynamic hairpins , EE inaccuracies , Inaccuracies in A |
|||||||||||
b. 5-6
|
composition: Op. 2, Variations, complete
..
In A, the short category imprint: Graphic ambiguousness; Differences between sources; Editorial revisions issues: Inaccuracies in GE , Inaccuracies in FE , Scope of dynamic hairpins , EE inaccuracies , Inaccuracies in A |
|||||||||||
b. 6
|
composition: Op. 29, Impromptu in A♭ major
..
The crescendo hairpins are marked slightly different in each of the sources. The right-hand end of the hairpins in A is unclear. Comparison with analogous bars and FE and EE versions (out of which one is most probably based on a different autograph), enables considering A's notation as inaccurate. We harmonise the notation according to analogous places. category imprint: Graphic ambiguousness; Differences between sources; Editorial revisions issues: Scope of dynamic hairpins |
|||||||||||
b. 6
|
composition: Op. 26 No 1, Polonaise in C♯ minor
..
The sources differ in the range of category imprint: Graphic ambiguousness; Interpretations within context; Differences between sources issues: EE revisions , Inaccuracies in GE , Inaccuracies in FE , Scope of dynamic hairpins , GE revisions , Inaccuracies in A |
|||||||||||
b. 6-7
|
composition: Op. 31, Scherzo in B♭ minor
..
The analysis of the category imprint: Differences between sources; Editorial revisions issues: Long accents , Inaccuracies in GE , Inaccuracies in FE , Scope of dynamic hairpins , GE revisions |