Issues : fz – f
b. 21
|
composition: Op. 10 No 6, Etude in E♭ minor
category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Errors in FE , fz – f |
||||||
b. 26
|
composition: Op. 10 No 4, Etude in C♯ minor
..
in FE (→GE,EE) is clearly the engraver's mistake here. It is revealed by in the analogous situation in the previous bar and by a number of other obvious examples of distortion of this mark (see, e.g., the note to bars 16-18). category imprint: Interpretations within context; Differences between sources issues: Inaccuracies in FE , fz – f |
||||||
b. 32
|
composition: Op. 10 No 6, Etude in E♭ minor
category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Errors in FE , fz – f |
||||||
b. 34
|
composition: Op. 10 No 4, Etude in C♯ minor
..
, uncommon in Chopin's autographs, is probably erroneous. Out of a few possible conjectures – , , , – we suggest , which, according to us, corresponds best to the context between cresc. and . Cf. bars 1 and 16. category imprint: Interpretations within context; Differences between sources; Editorial revisions issues: Inaccuracies in FE , fz – f |
||||||
b. 47
|
composition: Op. 25 No 6, Etude in G♯ minor
..
According to us, the authenticity of does not raise any doubts. In turn, in FC (→GE) may be a result of an inaccurate interpretation of [A] by the copyist – the 'f' and 'z' letters from some of Chopin merge in such a way that they can be considered as one 'f' letter, i.e. (see the Etude in E major, Op. 10 No. 11, bar 25 or 50). category imprint: Differences between sources issues: fz – f |