



b. 11
|
composition: Op. 28 No. 3, Prelude in G major
..
As was the case in b. 3-6, the version of FCI – almost certainly earlier – does not separate the final c2-d2 second with a rest. Cf. also b. 7-10. category imprint: Differences between sources; Corrections & alterations |
|||||
b. 11
|
composition: Op. 28 No. 3, Prelude in G major
..
category imprint: Differences between sources |
|||||
b. 11
|
composition: Op. 28 No. 4, Prelude in E minor
..
The fact that the chord was not changed in the middle of the bar must be a mistake of the engraver of GE. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Errors in GE |
|||||
b. 11-19
|
composition: Op. 28 No. 4, Prelude in E minor
..
Both in b. 11 and 19, the grace notes in A (→FE→EE) are non-slashed, whereas in FC (→GE) – slashed. It is an inaccuracy that would often happen to Fontana-copyist, in this case almost certainly contrary to the intention of Chopin. The Chopinesque entries in FED equate the grace note and the crotchet with two quavers, which can be considered one of the performance possibilities of these motifs. We recommend a slightly shorter grace note, which could be written down as category imprint: Differences between sources; Source & stylistic information issues: Annotations in teaching copies , Annotations in FED , Non-slashed grace notes , Fontana's revisions |
|||||
b. 11
|
composition: Op. 28 No. 5, Prelude in D major
..
Due to the coincidence of minor inaccuracies of FC and GE, the category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Inaccuracies in GE , Inaccuracies in FC |