Issues : Errors in FE
b. 533
|
composition: Op. 39, Scherzo in C♯ minor
..
The c2-a2 sixth adopted for the main text based on EE and GC (→GE) harmonically conludes the passage and is a melodic connector between c2 sounds in bars 529 and 534. The authenticity of the a1-a2 octave in FE is not certain - the engraver's mistake seems probable here. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Errors in FE , Terzverschreibung error |
|||||||||
b. 533
|
composition: Op. 11, Concerto in E minor, Mvt I
..
In the source version, we encounter evident, awkward in this context, parallel e-e1 and g-g1 octaves. A comparison with analogous bar 178 suggests – in the absence of arguments for differentiating these bars – a possibility of an erroneous swap of notes by the engraver of FE. Such mistakes can be found in first editions of Chopin's pieces, e.g. in the Prelude in B Minor, Op. 28 No. 16, bar 2 (in GE). Moreover, it cannot be excluded that it is the original version of that place, corrected in bar 178 and inadvertently left here. This possibility is indicated by the melodic shape of this bar, analogous to the previous figure – using a recent scheme in an accompanying figure is a natural starting point in the composing process. category imprint: Editorial revisions issues: Errors in FE , Omitted correction of an analogous place |
|||||||||
b. 533-534
|
composition: Op. 31, Scherzo in B♭ minor
category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Annotations in teaching copies , EE revisions , Errors in FE , Annotations in FED |
|||||||||
b. 540-565
|
composition: Op. 39, Scherzo in C♯ minor
..
No continuation of the dashed line determining the scope of cresc. on the new page in FE (from b. 542) must be an error. The replacemnent of a typical abbreviation with a full word split into syllables is a characteristic revison of EE. In the main text we present the GC (→GE) version. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: EE revisions , Errors in FE |
|||||||||
b. 540-543
|
composition: Op. 31, Scherzo in B♭ minor
..
In the main text we give the pedalling of A, the only irrefutably authentic. The missing pedalling in FC (→GE) may be a result of an oversight of the copyist: overlooked slurs suggest distraction. It is also likely that Chopin added it in A after having prepared FC. The missing mark seems to be an oversight of the engraver of FE. The oversight can result in a long, more or less four-bar pedal, to which this virtuoso passage in loud dynamics prompts. Such a pedalling was indicated – arbitrarily – in GE2 and removed in GE3. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Errors in FE , GE revisions , No pedal release mark , Errors of FC |