![](/build/images/logo_left-en.png)
![](/build/images/pl-button.5cab5de0.png)
![](/build/images/pomoc-button.d3d09842.png)
![](/build/images/pomoc-button-en.5098433b.png)
Issues : Inaccuracies in PE
b. 19
|
composition: WN 17, Polonaise in B♭ major
..
In JC there is no category imprint: Interpretations within context; Differences between sources issues: Accidentals in different octaves , Omission of current key accidentals , Errors of JC , Inaccuracies in PE |
||||||||
b. 22
|
composition: WN 17, Polonaise in B♭ major
..
In the main text we give category imprint: Interpretations within context; Differences between sources issues: Inaccuracies in PE |
||||||||
b. 25-31
|
composition: WN 17, Polonaise in B♭ major
..
The wedges over and under the first notes in bars 25, 27, 29, and 31 are only in PE. We consider this improvement of the notation, most probably introduced into [A], in the main text. The first of the wedges for the L.H. was mistakenly put under G category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Inaccuracies in PE |
||||||||
b. 25-31
|
composition: WN 17, Polonaise in B♭ major
..
In PE, the notation of the ornaments on the 2nd quaver in bars 25, 27, 29, and 31 is heterogeneous and taking into account coherent indications in JC and EF (four times category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Inaccuracies in PE |
||||||||
b. 26-30
|
composition: WN 17, Polonaise in B♭ major
..
In JC, the two-voice notation of chord pairs in bars 26 and 30 is not complete – it concerns only the first chord of each pair (after all, the notation in bar 30 is inaccurate). In the main text we give the more accurate notation of EF and PE (in the latter a minor error in bar 26 was not avoided). Similarly in bar 28. category imprint: Graphic ambiguousness; Differences between sources issues: Inaccuracies in PE |