Issues : Omitted correction of an analogous place
|
b. 286
|
composition: Op. 21, Concerto in F minor, Mvt I
..
In the main text we suggest tying e category imprint: Differences between sources; Editorial revisions issues: EE revisions , Omitted correction of an analogous place |
||||||||
|
b. 304
|
composition: Op. 44, Polonaise in F♯ minor
..
We add a cautionary category imprint: Editorial revisions |
||||||||
|
b. 310
|
composition: Op. 21, Concerto in F minor, Mvt I
..
In the analogous figure in bar 309, Chopin shortened the slur, so that it would start from the 2nd quaver. Therefore, it cannot be excluded that he forgot to introduce a similar correction in this place. Taking into account this possibility, we suggest a shorter slur as an alternative version. category imprint: Editorial revisions |
||||||||
|
b. 344
|
composition: Op. 21, Concerto in F minor, Mvt III
..
The dotted rhythm in A is the original version (cf. analogous bar 20), left here by Chopin, perhaps unintentionally. Therefore, the quavers in GE (→FE→EE) may be a result of Chopin's proofreading, although the absence of visible traces of performing changes in print allows us to consider a possible mistake of the engraver. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Authentic corrections of GE , Omitted correction of an analogous place |
||||||||
|
b. 374
|
composition: Op. 31, Scherzo in B♭ minor
..
The fact that there is no indication that f category imprint: Editorial revisions |
2 repeated in 
to e1 in the main text.
should be taken over by the L.H. is to be considered an inaccuracy of notation. Chopin could have considered the indication in very similar