Issues : Omitted correction of an analogous place
b. 257
|
composition: Op. 31, Scherzo in B♭ minor
..
In the main text we suggest the D note introduced by Chopin in the proofreading of FE in analogous b. 125, since Chopin's intentional differentiation between those bars seems to be less likely than an oversight of the correction in b. 257. category imprint: Editorial revisions |
|||
b. 269
|
composition: Op. 44, Polonaise in F♯ minor
..
In the main text we omit the b note in the chord on the 4th quaver of the bar. Chopin removed it in analogous b. 36 while proofreading FE and almost certainly forgot to do it also here – the reprise of the main section of the Polonaise was not written out in the manuscripts, which proves that Chopin did not foresee any differences between these fragments, particularly so minor. category imprint: Editorial revisions |
|||
b. 278
|
composition: Op. 44, Polonaise in F♯ minor
..
We add a cautionary to e1 in the main text. category imprint: Editorial revisions |
|||
b. 281
|
composition: Op. 44, Polonaise in F♯ minor
..
Like in b. 48, the chord with additional b1 present in the sources is most probably a mistake of Chopin. category imprint: Editorial revisions |
|||
b. 283
|
composition: Op. 21, Concerto in F minor, Mvt I
..
We consider that the subtle improvement introduced by Chopin in the proofreading of FE in the analogous bar in the exposition is valid also here. Chopin would often overlook proofreading of one of a few similar places. category imprint: Editorial revisions |