data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/73ecd/73ecd80c88ad44c39f3711b6bcc33ca9e1021267" alt=""
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/75013/75013441a15e45e6f391d55c49aaf803f3dff8a4" alt=""
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/57140/571405c7057401412640722d57e0f4262876af22" alt=""
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/3075f/3075f31e8b155e01785c3a53896ad205598099cf" alt=""
b. 1
|
composition: Op. 10 No 1, Etude in C major
..
In CLI there are no performance indications in the entire Etude. Both the indication of tempo and articulation was most probably added by Chopin in proofreadings of FE (→GE,EE) – cf. the beginning of the Etude in A minor, No. 2. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Metronome tempos |
||||||||
b. 1
|
composition: Op. 10 No 1, Etude in C major
..
The category imprint: Interpretations within context; Differences between sources issues: Centrally placed marks |
||||||||
b. 1-11
|
composition: Op. 10 No 1, Etude in C major
..
The fingering in bars 1, 4 and 11, as the entire fingering given in the main text of the Etude based on FE (→GE,EE), certainly comes from Chopin. In EE Fontana completed it in bars 2 and 8-10 with the digits describing the fingering indicated by Chopin in a slightly more accurate manner. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: EE revisions |
||||||||
b. 1-2
|
composition: Op. 10 No 1, Etude in C major
..
In both known copies of EE2, the omitted accents were added by hand. They were also added in the later impressions of EE. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Errors in EE |
||||||||
b. 1-11
|
composition: Op. 10 No 1, Etude in C major
..
In the main text we give the undoubtedly authentic pedalling of FE (→GE1→GE2,→EE). In later GE the indications were omitted – presumably by mistake – in bars 9-10. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Errors in GE |