Issues : Accompaniment changes
b. 12
|
composition: Op. 24 No. 3, Mazurka in A♭ major
..
 
category imprint: Differences between sources; Corrections & alterations issues: EE revisions , Errors in GE , Accompaniment changes , Authentic corrections of FE |
||||||||||||
b. 12
|
composition: Op. 24 No. 3, Mazurka in A♭ major
..
A distinct difference in notation is barely perceptible with the authentic pedalling. Elements crossed out in A show the following abandoned version of the first ending: category imprint: Differences between sources; Corrections & alterations issues: Corrections in A , Accompaniment changes , Main-line changes |
||||||||||||
b. 12
|
composition: Op. 10 No 2, Etude in A minor
category imprint: Differences between sources; Corrections & alterations issues: Accompaniment changes |
||||||||||||
b. 12
|
composition: Op. 10 No 2, Etude in A minor
..
Same as in bar 4, the rhythm's corrections written in FEcor confirm that the crotchets in CLI and Ap is the original version, changed by Chopin in all three analogous places (also in bar 39). category imprint: Differences between sources; Corrections & alterations |
||||||||||||
b. 12
|
composition: Op. 25 No 7, Etude in C♯ minor
..
It is unclear how the difference in the rhythm in this place was created, however, none of these two versions seems to be erroneous. The notation of EE indicates a possibility of the engraver's error – the b1 semiquaver is placed closer to the bar line than the g semiquaver, therefore, it is possible that in the base text to EE the rhythm was the same as in GC. It also cannot be excluded that the additional dot and beam were added in GC by Chopin, although the graphical image of the notation rather does not confirm it. Due to the above ambiguities, in the main text we give the double dotted rhythm, present in the base source (GC). category imprint: Differences between sources; Corrections & alterations issues: Accompaniment changes , Authentic corrections in GC , Dotted or even rhythm |