Issues : Long accents
|
b. 9-10
|
composition: Op. 10 No 7, Etude in C major
..
In FE the type of the accent in bar 9 (short or long) is not obvious – in GE it was reproduced as short, in EE – as long. In FE (→GE,EE) the short accent in bar 10 was overlooked. In FED Chopin added a long accent in bar 9, confirming the printed sign. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Long accents , Annotations in teaching copies , Errors in FE , Annotations in FED , Inaccuracies in GE |
||||||||||
|
b. 9-10
|
composition: Op. 25 No 4, Etude in A minor
..
It is not entirely clear which type of accents Chopin had in mind in these bars (similarly in bars 39-40). The second of them is undoubtedly a long accent, yet the first one, in spite of a seemingly analogous situation, can hardly be considered to be such an accent. As the notation of accents in the Etudes is not very precise, we consider it to be acceptable to see both signs as long accents. category imprint: Graphic ambiguousness; Differences between sources issues: Long accents , Inaccuracies in FC |
||||||||||
|
b. 10-12
|
composition: Op. 29, Impromptu in A♭ major
category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Long accents |
||||||||||
|
b. 10
|
composition: Op. 24 No. 4, Mazurka in B♭ minor
category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Long accents |
||||||||||
|
b. 10-11
|
composition: Op. 10 No 6, Etude in E♭ minor
..
The accent in bar 10 in A is shorter than a few previous ones and the one in bar 11; however, it seems to be an inaccurate notation. In the editions the sign in bar 11 was omitted. category imprint: Graphic ambiguousness; Differences between sources issues: Long accents , Inaccuracies in FE |
