Issues : Errors in EE
b. 482
|
composition: Op. 31, Scherzo in B♭ minor
..
There are no reasons to believe the version of EE to be authentic. Therefore, the disturbance of the pianistic regularity of the passages, unjustified in terms of harmony, must be a mistake. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Errors in EE |
||||||
b. 490
|
composition: Op. 11, Concerto in E minor, Mvt III
category imprint: Differences between sources issues: EE revisions , Errors in EE |
||||||
b. 493
|
composition: Op. 39, Scherzo in C♯ minor
..
In EE E1 must have been omitted. Similarly to the previous bars, we replace the existing notation - 8 - with written out notes. category imprint: Differences between sources; Editorial revisions issues: Errors in EE , Abbreviated octaves' notation |
||||||
b. 497-525
|
composition: Op. 39, Scherzo in C♯ minor
..
In this part also - the last one of its kind in the passage of Scherzo - the beginning of slurs in GC raises doubts when it comes to intrerpreting Chopin's intentions. Already in GE, based on GC, the GC were never rewritten here in accordance with the noatation (while slurs for LH were added). In EE and FE the slurs always begin on quaver figurations (except for the obviously wrongly missing slur in EE in b. 521). In GC the endings of the discussed slurs are notated inaccurately: in bars 501, 509 and 517 the slurs end over the pause on the second beat of the bar. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Errors in EE , GE revisions , Inaccuracies in GC |
||||||
b. 505-509
|
composition: Op. 39, Scherzo in C♯ minor
..
Disregarding the first chord, in EE there is no lowering all d to d in different octaves. This was the exact copyist's notation of GC, however Chopin added five out of thirteen nevessary accidentals. The notation of FE and GE is completely correct. category imprint: issues: Errors in EE , GE revisions , Omission of current key accidentals , Last key signature sign , Inaccuracies in GC , Authentic corrections in GC |