![](/build/images/logo_left-en.png)
![](/build/images/pl-button.5cab5de0.png)
![](/build/images/pomoc-button.d3d09842.png)
![](/build/images/pomoc-button-en.5098433b.png)
Issues : Errors of JC
b. 66
|
composition: WN 17, Polonaise in B♭ major
..
In JC, the bass clef is not restored, which is a patent mistake. The same applies to bar 102. category imprint: Interpretations within context; Differences between sources issues: Errors of JC |
|||||
b. 67
|
composition: WN 17, Polonaise in B♭ major
..
Compatible versions of EF and PE suggest an oversight of the slur in JC. However, it is possible that the slur appeared in [AI] later or it was Fontana who added it in his edition, knowing or guessing Chopin's intentions in relation to this detail. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Errors of JC |
|||||
b. 68
|
composition: WN 17, Polonaise in B♭ major
..
JC lacks all four dots extending the semiquavers on the 1st beat of the bar. It is a patent error. category imprint: Interpretations within context; Differences between sources issues: Errors of JC |
|||||
b. 70
|
composition: WN 17, Polonaise in B♭ major
..
In JC, the last note in this bar is an e category imprint: Interpretations within context; Differences between sources issues: Errors of JC |
|||||
b. 71
|
composition: WN 17, Polonaise in B♭ major
..
In EF first three groups of demisemiquavers are written with an octave sign. In JC the notes are written in the same way, yet the octave sign was omitted, which is a patent error. In this graphic layout the f category imprint: Differences between sources; Source & stylistic information issues: Errors of JC |