Page: 
Source: 
p. 17, b. 208-227
p. 1, b. 1-17
p. 2, b. 18-29
p. 3, b. 30-44
p. 4, b. 45-54
p. 5, b. 55-61
p. 6, b. 62-63
p. 7, b. 64-87
p. 8, b. 88-109
p. 9, b. 110-122
p. 10, b. 123-139
p. 11, b. 140-147
p. 12, b. 148-155
p. 13, b. 156-163
p. 14, b. 164-180
p. 15, b. 181-191
p. 16, b. 192-207
p. 17, b. 208-227
p. 18, b. 228-254
p. 19, b. 255-265
p. 20, b. 266-274
p. 21, b. 275-293
p. 22, b. 294-304
p. 23, b. 305-316
p. 24, b. 317-326
p. 25, b. 327-336
p. 26, b. 337-348
p. 27, b. 349-360
p. 28, b. 361-370
p. 29, b. 371-382
Main text
Main text
AsI - Working autograph of score
A - Autograph fair copy
GE - German edition
GE1 - First German edition
GE2 - Corrected impression of GE1
GE3 - Second German edition
FE - French edition
FE1 - First French edition
FE2 - Corrected impression of FE1
FESB - Later French edition
EE - English edition
EE1 - First English edition
EE2 - Corrected impression of EE1
EE3 - Revised impression of EE2
Select notes: 
Category
All
Graphic ambiguousness
Interpretations within context
Differences between sources
Editorial revisions
Corrections & alterations
Source & stylistic information
Notation
All
Pitch
Rhythm
Slurs
Articulation, Accents, Hairpins
Verbal indications
Pedalling
Fingering
Ornaments
Shorthand & other
Differences
No differences
AsI - Working autograph of score
A - Autograph fair copy
GE - German edition
GE1 - First German edition
GE2 - Corrected impression of GE1
GE3 - Second German edition
FE - French edition
FE1 - First French edition
FE2 - Corrected impression of FE1
FESB - Later French edition
EE - English edition
EE1 - First English edition
EE2 - Corrected impression of EE1
EE3 - Revised impression of EE2
Importance
All
Important
Main
Prezentacja
Select 
copy link PDF Main text


  b. 216

2 staccato dots in A, probable reading

No marks in remaining sources

8 staccato dots suggested by the editors

Both dots visible in A over the first two R.H. semiquavers are quite far from the notes and clearly not in the same line (vertically speaking); therefore, one wonders whether they are not accidental spots. However, the dots are clear and regular, while the shifts with respect to the notes they probably concern are similar both in terms of distance and direction. Therefore, we assume that they are staccato dots with which Chopin indicated a slightly different type of articulation – most probably lighter – of the  semiquavers. In the main text, for the sake of clarity, we suggest adding dots in the entire 1st half of the bar.
The markings were not included by GE1 and the remaining editions, perhaps due to the atypical placement described above. 

Compare the passage in the sources »

category imprint: Graphic ambiguousness; Differences between sources; Editorial revisions

issues: Errors in GE

notation: Articulation, Accents, Hairpins

Missing markers on sources: AsI, A, GE1, GE2, GE3, FESB, FE2, EE1, EE2, EE3, FE1