b. 359
|
composition: Op. 2, Variations, complete
..
As in bar 345, the engraver of GE (→EE,FESB) erroneously reproduced the B-b octave in a normal font, which requires it to be included in the solo part. Chopin restored the correct notation in FE. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Errors in GE , Authentic corrections of FE |
|||||
b. 359
|
composition: Op. 2, Variations, complete
..
In the main text we suggest hairpins under the L.H. motifs after three previous analogous bars 341, 345 and 355. Crescendos in such figures are one of the elements defining the shape of a motif, hence the absence of marks must be considered Chopin's oversight. category imprint: Editorial revisions |
|||||
b. 360
|
composition: Op. 2, Variations, complete
..
In the main text we suggest marks after analogous bar 346. Chopin wrote similar pairs of marks also in bars 342 and 356. According to us, these pairs of hairpins, as emphasising the brilliant nature of the bravura passages, are to be considered an integral part of notation. category imprint: Editorial revisions |
|||||
b. 361
|
composition: Op. 2, Variations, complete
..
The omission of the hairpin coupled with the cresc. indication was an arbitrary decision of the engraver of GE1. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: GE revisions |
|||||
b. 361
|
composition: Op. 2, Variations, complete
..
As before (bars 343 and 347 and bar 357), in EE the horizontal accents were arbitrarily changed to vertical ones. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: EE revisions |