Page: 
Source: 
p. 1, b. 1-32
p. 1, b. 1-32
p. 2, b. 33-68
p. 3, b. 69-102
Main text
Main text
AI - Earlier autograph
FE - French edition
FE1 - First French edition
FE2 - Corrected impression of FE1
FES - Stirling copy
GE - German edition
GE1 - First German edition
GE2 - Second German edition
GE3 - Corrected impression of GE2
EE - English edition
EEW - First English edition
EEC - Later English edition
Select notes: 
Category
All
Graphic ambiguousness
Interpretations within context
Differences between sources
Editorial revisions
Corrections & alterations
Source & stylistic information
Notation
All
Pitch
Rhythm
Slurs
Articulation, Accents, Hairpins
Verbal indications
Pedalling
Fingering
Ornaments
Shorthand & other
Differences
No differences
AI - Earlier autograph
FE - French edition
FE1 - First French edition
FE2 - Corrected impression of FE1
FES - Stirling copy
GE - German edition
GE1 - First German edition
GE2 - Second German edition
GE3 - Corrected impression of GE2
EE - English edition
EEW - First English edition
EEC - Later English edition
Importance
All
Important
Main
Prezentacja
Select 
copy link PDF Main text


  b. 24

No mark in AI

Reversed short accent in FE (→GE1,EEC)

Accent in EEW & GE2 (→GE3)

Reversed long accent suggested by the editors

The authenticity of the reversed short accent of FE (→EEC) is questionable, since such marks are absent in Chopinesque autographs. Therefore, we are most probably dealing with a reversed mark, as it was assessed in GE2 (→GE3) and EEW, or with it having been shortened, which we consider more likely due to the ascending second motif – see the Concerto in E minor, Op. 11, II mov., bar 29, and the Prelude in G, Op. 28 No. 3, bars 17-18.

Compare the passage in the sources »

category imprint: Differences between sources; Corrections & alterations

issues: Inaccuracies in GE, EE inaccuracies

notation: Articulation, Accents, Hairpins

Missing markers on sources: AI, EEW, EEC, FE1, FE2, FES, GE1, GE2, GE3