Page: 
Source: 
p. 2, b. 15-22
p. 1, b. 1-14
p. 2, b. 15-22
Main text
Main text
A - Autograph
FC - Fontana's copy
FE - French edition
FE1 - First French edition
FE2 - Corrected impression of FE1
FED - Dubois copy
FEJ - Jędrzejewicz Copy
FES - Stirling copy
FESch - Scherbatoff copy
GE - German edition
GE1 - First German edition
GE2 - Revised impression of GE1
GE3 - Corrected impression of GE2
EE - English edition
EE1 - First English edition
EE1a - Corrected impression of EE1
EE2 - Revised impression of EE1a
Select notes: 
Category
All
Graphic ambiguousness
Interpretations within context
Differences between sources
Editorial revisions
Corrections & alterations
Source & stylistic information
Notation
All
Pitch
Rhythm
Slurs
Articulation, Accents, Hairpins
Verbal indications
Pedalling
Fingering
Ornaments
Shorthand & other
Differences
No differences
A - Autograph
FC - Fontana's copy
FE - French edition
FE1 - First French edition
FE2 - Corrected impression of FE1
FED - Dubois copy
FEJ - Jędrzejewicz Copy
FES - Stirling copy
FESch - Scherbatoff copy
GE - German edition
GE1 - First German edition
GE2 - Revised impression of GE1
GE3 - Corrected impression of GE2
EE - English edition
EE1 - First English edition
EE1a - Corrected impression of EE1
EE2 - Revised impression of EE1a
Importance
All
Important
Main
Prezentacja
Select 
copy link PDF Main text


  b. 19-22

The extensive crossings-out in A – the entire ending of the piece starting from b. 19 was eventually crossed out and had to be rewritten – reveal that Chopin was looking for the best way to transfer the figuration from the topmost register back to the middle range of the instrument.

  • Bar 19 was a transposition of b. 11 (an octave higher).
  • Bar 20 was a counterpart of b. 19 of the final version – the R.H. part was exactly the same, and in the L.H. part Chopin probably wrote the following text: . The notation bears traces of local corrections performed before the entire ending was crossed out, hence it seems impossible to decipher all elements of notation, not to mention determining the order of versions, without specialised studies (e.g. one can see an even earlier – crossed out separately – notation of the beginning of the 2nd half of the bar ).
  • In the middle of b. 20, discussed above, one can see a crossed-out bar line, which is followed by a half of a bar compliant with one of the halves of b. 20 of the final version. Therefore, Chopin may have initially miscalculated the length of the ending, which also significantly contributed to the decision about the need to rewrite the entire ending.
  • The final 2 bars (21-22) were being changed only in the L.H. part. The earlier version is presented below: . On the 1st beat of b. 21 one can see traces of corrections suggesting that, e.g. the initial note was a semiquaver. Chopin then crossed out the entire notation of that bar and rewrote it on a stave below in the final version. However, the latter was also crossed out, since the accumulation of corrections and excess of bars forced the composer to rewrite b. 19-22.

Compare the passage in the sources»

category imprint: Corrections & alterations; Source & stylistic information

issues: Corrections in A, Deletions in A, Accompaniment changes, Main-line changes

notation: Pitch

Missing markers on sources: A, FC, FE1, FE2, FED, FEJ, FES, FESch, GE1, GE2, GE3, EE1, EE2, EE1a