Select: 
Category
All
Graphic ambiguousness
Interpretations within context
Differences between sources
Editorial revisions
Corrections & alterations
Source & stylistic information
Notation
All
Pitch
Rhythm
Slurs
Articulation, Accents, Hairpins
Verbal indications
Pedalling
Fingering
Ornaments
Shorthand & other
Importance
All
Important
Main


b. 17-18

composition: Op. 28 No. 2, Prelude in A minor

slentando in A (→FE) & CGS

slentando in FC

slentando in GE

slentando in EE

..

In A Chopin started writing the indication slentando at the end of b. 17, just after the last quaver in that bar. In FC the beginning of that indication occurs slightly earlier, and the handwriting is more condensed, as a result of which, in GE, in which b. 18 opens a new line, slentando was divided into 2 parts; moreover, it was moved further to the left. In FE the entire word was placed in b. 18, which, according to us, better conveys the notation of A. That notation, although not entirely accurately, was also reproduced in EE.
Fortunately, the placement of this indication, although problematic for editors, does not make a huge difference in practice.

category imprint: Differences between sources

b. 18-19

composition: Op. 28 No. 2, Prelude in A minor

Slur in A (→FEEE) & CGS

No slur in FC (→GE)

..

The absence of the L.H. slur in FC (→GE) is an oversight by the copyist – see bars 13-16.

category imprint: Differences between sources

issues: Errors of FC

b. 18-19

composition: Op. 28 No. 2, Prelude in A minor

..

The crossings-out visible in As reveal that the topmost notes of the L.H. part were initially written at the pitch of a, and not f (like in b. 15-16).

category imprint: Corrections & alterations; Source & stylistic information

issues: Accompaniment changes

b. 19-21

composition: Op. 28 No. 2, Prelude in A minor

..

In As one can see the notation of the initial L.H. part, which was eventually replaced with rests. That notation covers 2 repeat signs of the four-quaver figure from b. 18 in b. 19, the repeat sign of b. 19 in b. 20 and the minim E-A-f chord in the 1st half of b. 21. After expanding the abbreviations, we obtain the following text: (the versions of the chord in the 2nd half of b. 21 – see the note concerning that bar).
The new (final) concept was marked already in As in b. 19 (the repeat sign was crossed out, and a minim rest was added in the 2nd half of the bar) and at the beginning of b. 21 (the minim chord was crossed out). However, the repeat sign in b. 20 indicating a repetition of the previous bar was not crossed out, which is most probably an oversight, natural in a hastily written draft (when interpreted literally, the visible notation indicates a repetition of four quavers from b. 20 in the 1st half of b. 20). 

category imprint: Interpretations within context; Differences between sources; Corrections & alterations

issues: Accompaniment changes

b. 21

composition: Op. 28 No. 2, Prelude in A minor

e & B in As

E & B1 in A (→FCGE, →FEEE) & CGS

..

The crossings-out visible in As reveal that the bottom voices of the chords in the 2nd half of the bar were changed twice. The initial version, which was crossed out, continued the previous harmonic filling of b. 19-21 (see the note in b. 19):
. Having forgone the accompaniment in the preceding bars, Chopin also crossed out the bottom notes of the crotchet chords, which resulted in a precise gradation of the number of voices: from one in b. 20, through two in the 1st half of b. 21, three and four in the 2nd half, to five and six in b. 22. In the final version, that effect was abandoned in favour of a bass line referring to the quaver figures in b. 18-19, like they refer – also preceded by a rest – to b. 15-16.

category imprint: Differences between sources; Corrections & alterations

issues: Chopin's hesitations , Accompaniment changes