mUltimate Chopin

Op. 31, Scherzo in B♭ minor

Text Compare Notes Sources Description
Page: 
Source: 
p. 9, b. 265-303
p. 1, b. 1-43
p. 2, b. 44-76
p. 3, b. 77-102
p. 4, b. 103-132
p. 5, b. 133-175
p. 6, b. 176-208
p. 7, b. 209-234
p. 8, b. 235-264
p. 9, b. 265-303
p. 10, b. 304-333
p. 11, b. 334-365
p. 12, b. 366-405
p. 13, b. 406-435
p. 14, b. 436-467
p. 15, b. 468-493
p. 16, b. 494-523
p. 17, b. 524-551
p. 18, b. 552-583
p. 19, b. 584-626
p. 20, b. 627-657
p. 21, b. 658-682
p. 22, b. 683-707
p. 23, b. 708-739
p. 24, b. 740-780
Main text
Main text
A - Autograph
FC - Fontana's copy
FE - French edition
FE1 - First French edition
FED - Dubois copy
FES - Stirling copy
FESf - Schiffmacher copy
GE - German edition
GE1 - First German edition
GE2 - Second German edition
GE3 - Corrected impression of GE2
EE - English edition
EE1 - First English edition
EE2 - Revised impression of EE1
EE3 - Corrected impression of EE2
Select notes: 
Category
All
Graphic ambiguousness
Interpretations within context
Differences between sources
Editorial revisions
Corrections & alterations
Source & stylistic information
Notation
All
Pitch
Rhythm
Slurs
Articulation, Accents, Hairpins
Verbal indications
Pedalling
Fingering
Ornaments
Shorthand & other
Differences
No differences
A - Autograph
FC - Fontana's copy
FE - French edition
FE1 - First French edition
FED - Dubois copy
FES - Stirling copy
FESf - Schiffmacher copy
GE - German edition
GE1 - First German edition
GE2 - Second German edition
GE3 - Corrected impression of GE2
EE - English edition
EE1 - First English edition
EE2 - Revised impression of EE1
EE3 - Corrected impression of EE2
Importance
All
Important
Main
Undo Clear
Prezentacja
Select 
copy link PDF Main text

  b. 268-269

Separate slurs in A (→FC→GE1, →FE→EE) & GE3

Continuous slur in GE2

The reviser of GE2 assimilated the slurring over the b. 268-269 and 288-289 with the slurring of an analogous phrase in b. 369-370. It is difficult to find a justification for that decision: the unquestionable text was changed in three places (also in b. 390-391) on the basis of the fourth, questionable one (the notation of FC in b. 369-370 actually does not suggest a combination of the slurs). Therefore, it comes as no surprise that GE3 returned to the authentic version.

Compare the passage in the sources»

category imprint: Differences between sources

issues: GE revisions

notation: Slurs

Missing markers on sources: FE1, FED, FES, FESf, GE1, GE2, GE3, EE1, EE2, EE3, A, FC
Complete ➔