Page:
Source:
p. 10, b. 304-333
Main text
Prezentacja
Select
In both bars the L.H. part was eventually crossed out after a series of alterations and rewritten on an adjacent stave. In the deleted version, most probably identical with the final one in terms of pitch, the following are noteworthy:
- Direction of the top voice crotchet stems. They are directed downwards, which means that Chopin opted for strictly two-part notation only when preparing the Scherzo for print. The starting point was the homogeneous movement of the crotchets while holding some notes to achieve a fuller sound ('harmonic legato'). See also b. 326-329.
- Whole-bar slurs, not included in the final version.
- A removed mark over the c
minim in b. 310, independent from the deletion of the entire bars, so probably earlier. It was probably a rest, which would suggest that its absence in the final version could have been intentional. However, Chopin could have added a rest, since he was considering to change to a strictly two-part notation; then he realised that he would have to introduce more corrections and removed the rest with the intention of rewriting the whole L.H. part from scratch.
Compare the passage in the sources »
category imprint: Corrections & alterations; Source & stylistic information
issues: Corrections in A, Deletions in A
notation: Shorthand & other
Missing markers on sources:
FE1, FED, FES, FESf, GE1, GE2, GE3, EE1, EE2, EE3, A, FC