Issues : GE revisions
|
b. 686-689
|
composition: Op. 31, Scherzo in B♭ minor
..
Just like in b. 235-238, the pair of two-bar category imprint: Differences between sources issues: GE revisions |
|||||||||
|
b. 690-691
|
composition: Op. 31, Scherzo in B♭ minor
..
In the main text we give a category imprint: Differences between sources issues: GE revisions |
|||||||||
|
b. 691
|
composition: Op. 31, Scherzo in B♭ minor
..
Due to the reasons discussed in b. 240 (the discussed bar is an exact repetition thereof), we consider the version of GE2 (→GE3) to be an acceptable variant. category imprint: Differences between sources; Editorial revisions issues: GE revisions |
|||||||||
|
b. 692-707
|
composition: Op. 31, Scherzo in B♭ minor
..
In the main text we give the indication cresc. - - - written by Chopin in FC (see the note to b. 65-66) The composer added crescendo in this fragment also in the proofreading of FE (→EE); however, he began it a bar later. That version, most probably later, can be considered equivalent. GE1 reproduced the indication of FC inaccurately, since from b. 697 it overlooked the dashes marking the range of cresc. That oversight was corrected in GE2 (→GE3). category imprint: Differences between sources; Corrections & alterations issues: Inaccuracies in GE , GE revisions , Authentic corrections of FE , Authentic corrections of FC |
|||||||||
|
b. 699-702
|
composition: Op. 31, Scherzo in B♭ minor
..
The continuous slur in GE2 is an arbitrary, baseless revision. The original slurring was restored in GE3. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: GE revisions |
in 
in bar 691 in 
1-g
