data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/d8754/d87542901ec59d50373e62fdeaa27658ebe3f57a" alt=""
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/45570/45570130d3350cb196b62a10f420cd4f4b65d05c" alt=""
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/37010/37010d435308e935082eee8514e9080629ef4a1b" alt=""
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bd4d9/bd4d9cd00d2c1945c34810fe11464c16c7fb995e" alt=""
Page:
Source:
p. 4, b. 90-122
Main text
Prezentacja
Select
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/d7b82/d7b820b948ce278659b49b455a47ea03216b60c9" alt=""
The missing staccato dots in the R.H. part in GE1 (→GE2) are a patent oversight of the engraver, completed in GE3. It is probably the response of oversight of dots, which occurred in FE in the next bar – in both editions, dots were overlooked in the bar ending a line of text (101 in FE, 100 in GE).
Compare the passage in the sources»
category imprint: Differences between sources
issues: Errors in GE
notation: Articulation, Accents, Hairpins
Missing markers on sources:
FE1, FED, FEH, FEJ, FES, GE1, GE2, GE3, EE1, EE2, EE3, GE2a, FEFo