Articulation, Accents, Hairpins
|
b. 94
|
composition: Op. 11, Concerto in E minor, Mvt II
..
Like in the case of the slur, the missing wedges over the 1st quaver in the bar (in both hands) in GE prove that Chopin most probably added them in the last phase of proofreading of FE (→EE). category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Authentic corrections of FE , Wedges |
||||||||
|
b. 96
|
composition: Op. 11, Concerto in E minor, Mvt II
..
One can ponder what type of accents Chopin meant in this bar – the markings are slightly longer than the undoubtedly short accent in bar 99, but clearly shorter than those in bar 94 (over e category imprint: Graphic ambiguousness; Differences between sources issues: Long accents , Errors in GE |
||||||||
|
b. 97
|
composition: Op. 11, Concerto in E minor, Mvt II
..
The missing accent must be considered Chopin's inaccuracy – cf. analogous bars 46, 48 and 95. category imprint: Editorial revisions |
||||||||
|
b. 101
|
composition: Op. 11, Concerto in E minor, Mvt II
..
The staccato marked in EE2, although certainly added by the editor, in effect, describes well the actual way of performance. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: EE revisions |
||||||||
|
b. 103
|
composition: Op. 11, Concerto in E minor, Mvt II
..
According to us, the missing staccato dots in this bar are to be considered an inaccuracy. The markings were added in GE3. category imprint: Differences between sources; Editorial revisions issues: GE revisions |
4) and 95 (over e). Due to this reason, we assume that they are short accents. The absence of the second marking in 
